Archive

Archive for the ‘Latest News’ Category

Shooting the facts

June 29th, 2010

The Sportsman’s Association would like to bring this video by Michael Yardley titled: Shooting, the sport, the facts.

This video shows shooting as it really is, and makes the point that the proper sporting and professional use of guns is often misrepresented in the mainstream media. Most people have a distorted view of shooting from having seen firearms misuse in the news and popular entertainment. This production tries to put the record straight and shows shooting as it really is. More than a million ordinary, law abiding, and completely normal people in the UK use firearms for sport or their work.

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

From the General Secretary, Latest News

March 2010 Newsletter

April 11th, 2010
March 2010 Newsletter
The forthcoming Election
The election is approaching and by the time this newsletter is published, no doubt a date will have been announced. So now it is time for the silent majority i.e.  You    to get off your backside and do something for your sport!  Now I don’t want to upset those stalwarts who have already been in touch with their prospective Parliamentary Candidates, you know who you are and we should all thankful for your efforts on our behalf. It is however, the silent majority that I would like to get doing something to help fight our corner.
I have heard it said in respect of Terrorism, that the only people that matter are the Terrorist extremists. Theirs is the only voice heard and the silent majority are Irrelevant.
Because the only voice the Government hears belongs to the extremists, this is the one that they make concessions to, generally to the detriment of the freedoms and way of life of the “Silent Majority”.
So it is with Shooters. Because you the “silent majority” do not make your voice heard, those in power disregard your wishes completely, because you don’t make them care enough to want to consider you at all. As far as they are concerned you are Irrelevant. They think that they can do whatever they like to you and you will stay silent and do nothing to withstand the injustice of it all. And so far, in the main they are right.
What I would like you all to do is to contact the PPCs for your Constituency and to ask them some simple questions, keep it brief and polite or you may be ignored.
  1. Are you pro or anti sports shooting?
  2. Would you vote in favour of the repeal of the Firearms (Amendment) ( No.2 ) Act 1997 ? Thus allowing .22 Target Pistols to be held on a Firearms Certificate and retained for use in Authorised Club Premises. This would enable people to train and achieve a high enough standard to be selected into the National Teams giving a broad base of potential members to select from.
  3. Would you oppose any move to Devolve Firearms Legislation to the Scottish
Parliament?
Point out to them that you are a Sports Shooter and that their answers will affect not only the way you vote but also that of your Family and many of your friends.
To contact your sitting MP, assuming that he is not retiring at this Election, could not be simpler.
Open up Google on your Computer, or on your children’s or Grandchildren’s if you do not have one of your own.
In the search box type in  “LIST OF MPs” then hit the Enter key.
At the top of the results page you should get UK Parliament – Alphabetical list of MPs
Left click the mouse on that column and another page will appear from www.Parliament.uk titled
Alphabetical list of MPs
On that page you will find a search box entitled “Find your MP”, Left click the mouse on that box, then type in your Post Code and hit the Enter key.
This will bring up a page with the details of your sitting MP, whoever they are. If you left click the mouse on the link “Email Joe Bloggs”, or whatever their name is, this will bring up a Performa Email, which you can fill out and send to them. It worked for me, so I’m sure that it will work for you, I even got a reply too.
For the other Prospective Parliamentary Candidates it is not so easy You will have to search for the Party and the Area i.e. “Salisbury Labour Party”, in that case I could only find an Address and Telephone number, I don’t know if that is typical, but you may find that in a constituency where a party is not strong they may be hard to contact and that may be why they are not strong?????  Which came first, the Chicken or the Egg?
I did manage to contact my local LIB. DEM. PPC and in his reply he asked for further details, in particular with respect of devolving Firearms Legislation to Scotland. I will have to put something together for him shortly, letting him know the why and wherefore of the whole sorry mess in Scotland.
But as you can see from the above, it is worth while contacting these people, because it gives you the opportunity to put our side of the argument across and to educate them if their knowledge is lacking.
When writing to PPCs and Sitting MPs, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, be polite to them. You may think that MPs are the Scum of the Earth, ( Especially after the Expenses Scandal ) they may even be the scum of the earth, but I don’t think that I want to go along that path. However, one thing is sure, you will do our cause no good at all if you are rude to them and alienate and antagonise them. You and I NEED their goodwill, however you may wish it were otherwise. I have been told that some of the letters that have been sent to MPs by shooters are not helping at all, in fact I have had it said to me “that if this is the type of person that wants their pistol back, then they will not get my backing”. So please be sensible how you go about it. It is human nature that people will not help those that are rude to them.
They want your vote and you want to shoot pistols again. So try to strike a bargain with them.
You will vote for them, if they will promise to vote to repeal the Amendment Act No 2.
I thought it might be as well to remind you of the conditions that will prevail, if we are able to persuade the Government to Repeal the Amendment No2 Act. So when you are discussing it with those concerned, you can assure them that we shall not be stalking the streets with our pistols, as many of the population were falsely told we used to before the ban.
If you wished to obtain a .22 pistol for Target Shooting, you would have to belong to a Club licensed to hold .22 pistols. See 19 and 20 below.  You would not be able to remove the pistol from the Club premises unless you had a permit to do so from the Police see 13 below.
Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 and Firearms (Amendment) (No.2)Act 1997
19 Purpose of Part II
(1) This Part provides for the licensing of pistol clubs and their premises and for the regulation of licensed pistol clubs.
(2) In this Act—
• “License” means a license granted under section 21 below in respect of a pistol club and any premises of that club; and “licensed pistol club” shall be construed accordingly.
• “Licensed premises”, in relation to a licensed pistol club, means any premises which are specified in the club’s license as being premises which may be used for the purpose of storing or using small-caliber pistols.
20 No pistol club to operate without a license
(1) No club shall allow any small-caliber pistol to be stored or used on any of its club premises in connection with target shooting, unless the club is a licensed pistol club.
(2) No licensed pistol club shall allow a small-caliber pistol to be stored or used on any of its club premises by any holder of a firearm certificate or visitor’s firearm permit subject to a condition that it is only to be used for target shooting, unless—
(a) the certificate or permit holder is a member of that club;
(b) the premises are specified in the club’s licence as premises at which small-calibre pistols may be stored and used;
(c) the premises are specified in the certificate or permit as the place where the pistol is to be kept.
(3) Subsection (2) above does not apply to—
(a) the storage on licensed premises of a licensed pistol club of a small-calibre pistol purchased or acquired by the responsible officer of that club for use only by members of the club in connection with target shooting;
(b) the use on licensed premises of a licensed pistol club of a small-calibre pistol by a member of the club who is permitted to have it in his possession by virtue of section 27(3) below; or
(c) the use of a pistol on the licensed premises of a licensed pistol club if the person using the pistol is authorised by a permit under section 13 above to have the pistol with him on those premises.
(4) If a small-calibre pistol is stored or used in contravention of subsection (1) or (2) above, the persons or any of the persons responsible for the management of the club commit an offence punishable on summary conviction with imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.
(5) In proceedings against any person for an offence under subsection (4) above, it shall be a defence for him to prove that he took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence.
(6) In this section “club premises” means premises which are occupied by and habitually used for the purposes of the club.
13 Permits to have small-calibre pistols outside licensed pistol clubs
(1) A person whose firearm certificate for a small-calibre pistol is held subject to a condition that the pistol must be kept at licensed premises of a licensed pistol club may make an application in the prescribed form to the chief officer of police for the area in which he resides for a permit under this section authorising a person specified in the permit to have the pistol in his possession outside those premises for any proper purpose.
(2) A permit under this section shall not, unless the circumstances appear to the chief officer of police to be exceptional, authorise any holder of a firearm certificate which relates to the pistol to have the pistol with him in any place other than the licensed premises of a licensed pistol club or the premises at which a designated target shooting competition specified in the permit is being held.
(3) A proper purpose for having a small-calibre pistol outside the licensed premises at which it is required to be kept may be any of the following, namely—
(a) conveying the pistol to those premises following—
(i) the release of the pistol from police custody under Schedule 1 to this Act;
(ii) the purchase or acquisition of the pistol; or
(iii) a change in the licensed premises at which the pistol is required to be kept;
(b) having the pistol repaired or maintained by a registered firearms dealer;
(c) enabling the pistol to be used at a designated target shooting competition;
(d) selling or otherwise disposing of the pistol; or
(e) any other purpose which appears to the chief officer of police to be proper in all the circumstances.
(4) Where a person makes an application under subsection (1) above in relation to a pistol, the chief officer of police may, if he thinks fit, grant a permit in the prescribed form; and any such permit—
(a) shall specify the purpose for which it is granted and the name of any person who is authorised by the permit to have the pistol in his possession; and
(b) shall be granted subject to such conditions as the chief officer of police thinks necessary to secure that such possession will not endanger the public safety or the peace; and any conditions may include a time by which the pistol must be taken or returned to the licensed premises specified in the applicant’s firearm certificate.
If you can impart this information to your PPCs and if they are able to understand it, you should be able to convince them that Repealing the No2 Act can be done with no threat to “Public Safety” and then you and I would be able to have our sport back, albeit in a pale shadow of the way it used to be. But it would mean that our Children could learn to shoot a pistol competitively and achieve a standard of expertise that would enable them to compete at world class level with every possibility of being a World Champion. Unlike today, where even the few who may be granted a section 5 exemption, due to lack of authorized ranges, will not be able to train daily, as is required at that level of competition if you are to have a fair chance. And where does the next generation of Target Pistol Shooters come from?

Latest News, News Letters 2010, News letters, Olympics 2010 , ,

Return of competitive pistol shooting in Great Britain

April 7th, 2010

The Sportsman’s Association would like to draw its members attention to the following paper:

The British Shooting Sports Council

The BSSC is a body that represents shooting sports in dealing with Parliament on our behalf. Its aims and objective is to promote and safeguard the Lawful use of Firearms and Air weapons for sporting and recreational purposes in the United Kingdom amongst all sections of the community.

The Organisations that are part of BSSC are:

Association of Professional Clay Target Shooting Grounds

Association of Professional Shooting Instructors

British Association for Shooting and Conservation

Countryside Alliance

Clay Pigeon Shooting Association

Gun Trade Association

Institute of Clay Shooting Instructors

Muzzle Loaders Association of Great Britain

National Rifle Association

National Smallbore Rifle Association

Sportsman’s Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

United Kingdom Practical shooting Association

BSSC policy on the return of competitive pistol shooting in Great Britain

Background: The National Rifle Association submitted a paper to the Technical & Research Committee on the 11th February, seeking an agreed Council policy on pistol shooting. There was agreement among those Association representatives present that such a policy was necessary and timely. The NRA was asked to convene a meeting of interested parties and to submit a report to Council.

A meeting was held at the NRA on the 24th March 2010. Present were: Glynn Alger, Secretary NRA (Chair), Alan Westlake and Mike Wells (SAGBNI), David Thomas (Chairman, British Pistol Club), Barbara Barber (BPC and British Women’s Pistol Association) and David Penn (BSSC). Geoff Doe (NSRA) sent his apologies.

Glynn Alger indicated that the Conservatives, were they to act on pistol shooting, would wish to do so early in a new government and wanted an agreed position from the sport. Timely agreement on a BSSC policy was therefore essential. He had discussed infrastructure and coaching issues already with Geoff Doe and the NRA and NSRA were already co-operating on a Sport England coaching project. There was also discussion on how best to manage the understandable wish of clubs and shooters to lobby parliamentary candidates on the subject. Following wide-ranging discussion of the political dimension, the following draft statement was agreed for consideration by the Council.

  1. The British Shooting Sports Council wishes to see competitive shooting with cartridge pistols re-instated under controlled conditions in Great Britain. It considers that the most straightforward way of initiating this would be by the repeal of the Firearms (Amendment) (No.2) Act 1997. This would adhere to the policy position of the Conservative Government in 1996 and is, we understand, straightforward and quick to achieve in terms of Parliamentary process. It would allow the re-commencement of .22 pistol shooting in ‘Licensed Pistol Clubs’. Subject to agreement on details of implementation and licensing, it would allow the development of a proper performance pyramid at the grass-roots level, essential  if we are to put our athletes on a level playing field and to achieve long-term podium success at Olympic, World Championship and Commonwealth Games levels. 
  2. The National Associations, mindful that public safety is paramount, will develop the security, training and coaching infrastructure for the Licensed Pistol Clubs. Coaching for national shooting success is already being developed in conjunction with Sport England and it is anticipated that similar programmes will be introduced in Scotland and Wales. 
  3. The BSSC notes that, according to NaBIS, .22 rimfire firearms and ammunition are only rarely used in crime, despite the very widespread use of .22 rifles for target shooting, small game hunting and vermin control. It further notes that the 1997 Amendment Acts have demonstrably had no effect on the growth in the criminal use of firearms in recent years. The BSSC is seeking to address the re-establishment of a well-controlled competitive sport which is far removed from criminal misuse.

From the General Secretary, Latest News, Olympics 2010 , , ,

Army Target Shooting Club & long barrelled pistols

February 21st, 2010

The Sportsmans Association would like to draw your attention to the following extracts from a letter that is being circulated by the Army Target Shooting Club.

The ATSC are investigating the possibility of allowing competitors with long barrelled pistols to compete alongside the air pistols in the ISSF events at our Open Meeting. The competition would be the same course of fire, shot in the spirit of the ISSF events.

For this to happen, we need to gauge the level of potential interest from you, the shooters. We would therefore ask you to respond, both to the person who sent you this letter and to myself at the email address above, with your potential intent to enter the ISSF events at the Open Meeting. Of course, we cannot hold you to your intent to enter, but it might go a long way to influencing us to amend our plans for the Meeting.

We would like to encourage all potential long barrelled shooters to get in touch and express their interest, also please let others know about this.

ATSC Long Barrel Letter

ATSC Pistol Open Poster

Competition, Latest News

BBC not covering events with shooting

February 21st, 2010

We have the 2010 Winter Olympics running at the moment in Vancouver, one of the events is the Biathlon — which combines cross-country skiing and rifle shooting.  It is sadly lacking from the BBCs coverage of the Winter Olympics.

If you would like to find out more about the sport please visit the Winter Olympics website:

How they train – Biathlon

About the sport – Biathlon

To see the entirety of the on-line coverage from the BBC please visit BBC Biathlon, while the on-line reporting is good sadly the coverage of this sport that includes shooting is sadly lacking from the television.

Latest News, Olympics 2010

Scottish Gun Ban

December 29th, 2009

The Sportsman’s Association would like to draw the following Number 10 petition to it’s members and ask them to support it.

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/ScottishGunBan/

The petition reads:

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to deny scots gun law:

The Calman Report recommends that The Scottish Parliament should be handed control of airgun legislation in Scotland. The Scottish Parliament will undoubtedly use this power to place a ban on unlicensed airguns in Scotland. This measure harms the legitimate sporting shooter and fails to address the real problem; that caused by unlawful use of airguns. Criminal use of airguns by its nature cannot be legislated against by removing airguns from those who abide by the law.

We believe that this ban will have an adverse effect on legitimate sporting shooting, and will provide no deterrent to those who misuse airguns. The Labour Party’s own ‘Charter for Shooting’ (2005) recognises there is no connection between legitimate sporting shooting and gun crime. Airgun crime in Scotland has fallen according to the Gun Control Network’s statistics from 1005 offences 15 years ago to 567 last year.

This new legislation would erode the civil liberties of sporting shooters in Scotland and fail to remove airguns from the hands of criminals.

We therefore petition you to refuse devolved power for Airgun legislation in Scotland.

Latest News

PRESS RELEASE – Will the 2012 shooting events lead to a death?

August 22nd, 2009

PRESS RELEASE


SPORTSMAN’S ASSOCIATION OF GREAT BRITAIN & NORTHERN IRELAND OLYMPIC DELIVERY AUTHORITITY (ODA) CRITICISED OVER LACK OF PLANNING OVER WOOLWICH A&E ACCESS DURING 2012 SHOOTING EVENTS


The Sportsman’s Association, which was formed in 1996 to oppose the ban on pistols, today accused the ODA of arrogance after discovering that no consultations or discussions have taken place with relevant authorities about the restricted access to the Woolwich Hospital A&E facilities during the shooting events that will take place during the 2012 Olympics
The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG) and the ODA have announced the shooting events will remain at Woolwich, using temporary facilities, thus ignoring the advice of shooting bodies to use the ranges at Bisley in Surrey saving £12m.

“The LOCOG/ODA decision will mean that the main roads to the hospital will be in the danger area and will have to be closed during the shooting events” said Albie Fox, spokesman for the association. “The ODA have failed to reply to my Freedom of Information requests but the London Ambulance Authority have and surprise, surprise they have confirmed that no impact assessments were or have been done” he added.

Mr Fox and other shooting organisations have been raising this matter and other concerns with LOCOG and the ODA through FOI requests but have been ignored. The ODA is determined to keep the shooting events at Woolwich despite the venue being totally unsuitable for the sport, will create lead pollution problems and will waste £42m as the facilities will be totally dismantled leaving no legacy for shooting sports.

“Apart from the waste of taxpayers money I find it incredible that no consultation has taken place with the Woolwich NHS Trust, the London Ambulance Authority and other affected local authorities on how the 2012 shooting events will deny the use of A&E facilities of those living and working in the area” said Albie. “If the restriction means a major delay for critically injured people to get to A&E facilities then lives can be lost and the blame will be laid firmly at the feet of the ODA” he added.

Albie went on “Should eventual discussions by the major stakeholders reveal unacceptable consequences and delay then it may be too late to move the venue as time is running out for alternatives, such as Bisley, to meet build deadlines. I hope that the people of Greenwich will wake up and demand that their elected representatives raise the matter with some urgency”.

Bisley, the home of British shooting, is 30 minutes from London, will be cheaper to modify to Olympic standards, will leave a lasting legacy for shooting sports and will not create any of the above problems.

Contact Albie Fox 07876 443 221


Editor’s Note

Background

FOI requests that have been submitted can be viewed at : http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/albie_fox_2
The FOI to the LAS and reply are below :
Sent: 30 July 2009 14:35

To: FOI Admin

Subject: Freedom of Information request from LAS website

Query :

Dear Sir or Madam,


How long and at what times will the roads adjacent to Woolwich Barracks be closed during the shooting events of the 2012 Olympics and associated rehearsals?

Please state what effect this will have on the access to the A&E unit at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich; and how much time will this add to ambulance journeys to other A&E facilities should access to the QE be prevented during the shooting competitions?

Has the local population and taxpayers been informed of these restrictions and any likely delays to A&E access?

Albie Fox


Dear Mr Fox

Thank you for your request for information, placed under the Freedom of Information Act (2000) (FOIA).

I can confirm that no decisions have been made as yet as detailed discussions about the way in which the route network will be managed and its operating regime have not yet commenced. I do however understand that London Borough of Greenwich have scheduled a number of meetings with key stakeholders including the emergency services, when these matters will be discussed and I should like to assure you that we are fully committed to engaging in this process.

I can also confirm that we are commissioning some work to assess the impact of the network and possible road closures on our emergency response times. We have as part of the initial consultation process also made clear our concerns that evidently no impact assessments were undertaken as far as this consideration although we are confident that this matter will be subsequently addressed accordingly.

You may wish to contact the Olympic Delivery Authority Transport

Department – see http://www.london2012.com/index.phpas – as they have the lead for establishing and managing the network as part of the integrated transport plan for the 2012 Games.

I do hope this information will be of assistance.

Yours sincerely

Gary Bassett

Head of Patient Experiences, London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Latest News

Gun Facts – Your Guide to Debunking Gun Control Myths

August 22nd, 2009

The Sportsman’s Association would like to point out this free electronic book available from http://www.gunfacts.info.

From the website:

Gun Facts is a free e-book that debunks common myths about gun control. It is intended as a reference guide for journalists, activists, politicians, and other people interested in restoring honesty to the debate about guns, crime…

Gun Facts has 98 pages of information. Divided into chapters based on gun control topics…

Each chapter lists common gun control myths, then lists a number of documented and cited facts (with nearly 500 detailed footnotes). Thus when a neighbor, editor or politician repeats some sound bite about firearm control policy, you can quickly find that myth then rebuke with real information.

Latest News

Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice

June 4th, 2009

The Sportsman’s Association would like to draw the attention of it’s members and all other shooters to a consultation paper Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice guidelines about the advertising of gun clubs.

We have been lumped in with “Prostitution, Sexual Services and Obscene and Restricted Material”, we think that placing a legal pastime which is carried out by the most law abiding section of the population, to be considered on a par with prostitution, Sexual Services and Obscene and Restricted Material is offencive in the extreme, and warrants an apology to the shooting community.

The only way we will get this apology is if we all unite with one voice and respond to the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice letting them know of our feelings.

We would like to point out to everyone that if you want to express your opinion on this mis classification they are happy to receive responses to the consultation by e-mail, but you will need to include their cover sheet which is in word format to their e-mail address bcapcodereview@cap.org.uk

From the General Secretary, Latest News

To help members with the standard reply.

June 2nd, 2009

RESPONSE TO THE ‘STANDARD LETTER’ THAT MPs ARE RECEIVING WHEN THEY CHALLENGE THE OLYMPIC DELIVERY AUTHORITY (ODA) ON HAVING THE 2012 SHOOTING EVENTS AT WOOLWICH

Those of you who have made the effort to contact your MP will know that they will have had a ’standard reply’ from the ODA that is at best economical with the truth and at worst downright lies. The following in italics are the responses of the ODA and in red are a statement of the facts from the NRA. Please go back to your MP and get them to challenge the ODA for further clarification.

Albie Fox

“None of the existing ranges at Bisley are suitable for Olympic and Paralympic competition so new ranges would need to be built.”

This is correct because the ranges built for the Commonwealth Games were not built to the standard or scale required for the Olympic Games, largely due to funding restrictions. The original budget for the ranges was £10 million plus but it was cut to £6.3 million giving the facilities that we see today. As for the Olympic venue we have had a full development team look at the requirements and the build costs at Bisley. The build for Bisley is £28-30 million.

“A limited long term use has not been identified for these new ranges.”

This is a lie. The Army and British shooting did a presentation to the ODA and LOCOG on 16th February 2009 that showed how we intended to use the Olympic Ranges for military marksmanship use, GB, England and Paralympic training as well as normal commercial use, which would have made them the most commercially efficient ranges in the UK.

“Additional accommodation would be required for athletes and officials.”

Again this is incorrect. There were three proposals on the table to use Surrey University, that has developed sports facilities and accommodation to Olympic standard, so there would be no build cost. We also identified Holloway College as an option (as it is already an Olympic Village) where they have planning to build 600 new beds to Olympic standard which would have accommodated the shooters. Thirdly we offered to build a village at Bisley to sell or lease the house on commercially post event.

“Land ownership is complex and separate exclusivity agreements would have had to be made with all the separate shooting bodies. These were not guaranteed.”

This is incorrect we proposed to develop a piece of land between Bisley and Pirbright owned by the MoD. This would have provided a stand alone facility effecting only 4 leaseholders all of whom had agreed to accommodate the Games. The MoD land would have been held on a 125 year lease by the NRA as an extension to its current lease as agreed with Defence Estates.

“The site lies within a greenbelt area adjacent to housing and is a designated Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).”

Correct but it is an existing range complex accommodating multiple range complexes for both civilian and military shooting. It is secure and safe when compared with Woolwich.

“There are significant risks given the very sensitive nature of the site and planning permission is not guaranteed.

There were challenges to develop the land in question but we were working in partnership with Natural England (who indicated that by undertaking certain procedures and land maintenance elsewhere on the Bisley site permissions should not have been a problem), Guildford and Surrey Heath Councils, South East England Development Agency and Surrey Council. If the ODA and LOCOG had committed to the project it would have been delivered in time.

The Bisley site would not be ready until at least January 2012 making it the last venue to be completed.”

The date of January 2012 was given because that was the date the ODA gave us for completion. The project could have delivered in the third quarter of 2011.

“The reputational risks associated with this are significant.”

It was more likely that Bisley could have been developed with ODA support that the current proposal at Woolwich which still has scale, security and safety problems. They are currently deliberately misleading local people at Woolwich regarding road closures and restricted access to the local A & E hospital which will require them to set up triage points around the site

“There is also huge pressure from the IOC and the broadcasters to keep as many venues as possible in London and create a ‘compact’ Games.”

The placing of a shooting venue in a urban area was not a sensible decision, that is why the NRA moved from Wimbledon in the late 19th Century. As for the excuses regarding the IOC, at Athens the IOC allowed the organisers to move 65% of the venues.

“Building ranges at Bisley will cost more.”

The range modification costs of Bisley at £30m were done by the same company that has costed other 2012 Olympic venues. Yet it is the only venue that the ODA is challenging. WHY?

From the General Secretary, Latest News